Posted by
UncleSamz on Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:47:49 PM
The Abortion Follow-up
I found some info articles pertaining to
the radio report I blogged about earlier.
Here are two for you to read: Here And here
And the point from earlier is—even though
abortions are down, there are still too many.
Geez, 1.2 million!
That’s too many and complicates things even
more. I say that and encourage all to
read the articles above to see why.
There are many perspectives to abortion like age, economic status,
single vs. hitched women, race, and you can probably find more.
It’s easy to be pro-life or pro-choice, but
it’s harder to say why and understand the opposing view as well.
Whether you see it as right or wrong, one
has to be sensitive and open to different life situations and our collective mind
set as a nation. From there we can go
forward together on solutions, agreements, and a LIVING understanding.
For years I waffled about abortion, and, of
course, I was young. Back then, abortion
seemed like a safety net you might have to use.
That’s what I mean about the collective mind set thing above. See, I came up in the first generation when
aborting babies was legal, and the way it is, was, played off around me, in
society, was—a medical procedure; a choice; a safety net. Nobody talked about it, necessarily, and a
pregnancy became like, I don’t know, a bad tooth that you didn’t expect and
need pulled.
There were no pictures of fetal development
in biology or health class or sex Ed. I
might remember reading something about the baby’s development and the trimester
thing.
I definitely remember “zygote” and “embryo.”
So, let that be testimony to the fact that
the teaching about the development of human life is warm water, at best, that’s
neither too hot nor too cold, and doesn’t question the aspect of when life
begins and what a person is.
And that is exactly where I want to go to
explain why I now know that abortion is wrong and should be discouraged.
It seems to me that Roe vs. Wade’s legal
precedent for allowing abortion is the idea of when a glump of flesh (baby)
becomes a PERSON, in that the Constitution guarantees the rights to LIFE,
LIBERTY, AND EQUALITY to PEOPLE. So,
because the justices’ rule that a baby isn’t a person until it, I don’t know,
breathes air or is born or maybe has brain waves, it doesn’t necessarily have
the Constitutional right to LIFE. This
allows the mother, who is a person enjoying Constitutional protection (afforded
by God), to legally remove the “non-person” flesh from her uterus and throw it
away—or save it for “The Matrix” machines to grow future human lives. HA HA.
Interesting.
Of course, this philosophy may lead us to
question when a LIVING PERSON doesn’t qualify to be a PERSON, since it seems
there are standards on what it means to be a person, thus providing the option
for the right to government assisted suicide and the right to DEATH.
Don’t forget about the idea of the government
determining which babies, embryos, or “potential human life” may be unfit for
life, and therefore MUST BE DESTROYED so as not to pollute the gene pool.
This is nothing new and is called eugenics.
Check this out…
Crazy stuff here
But I’m no scientist—just a thinker, and I
know when life begins and don’t get tripped up in this non-person thing and “choice.” And that’s why abortion is wrong—because that
is life—the embryo is life. When that
crazy sperm penetrates that egg, that tissue is alive. It’s different and it makes choices, in a
way, to stick to the uterine wall or not.
I don’t care if it’s “pre-programmed” instinct I don’t understand—but it
does it and I have to believe it fights like hell to attach itself and
survive. That’s the aspect the Supreme
Court back then just got wrong—and people are still getting it wrong and
probably want to. Life is more than
brainwaves and manifests itself on different levels and in different ways.
What I mean is, those sperm run fast to the
egg and with the same urgency a little kid runs for first in little
league. I’m probably belittling the life
process here, but I’m trying to do an Al Gore Explanation so everybody can
understand.
And, Son of a Gun, if it was the embryo of
a damn Bengal Tiger or Siberian Tiger or some almost extinct species, people
would be moving heaven and earth to keep it alive. It wouldn’t be an embryo to those doctors and
vets, it would be a baby tiger.
A single cell organism is alive.
People are worried about seals and whales
and POLAR BEARS.
AND 1.2 MILLION BABIES ARE ABORTED EACH
YEAR.
ONE MILLION TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND—EACH
YEAR!!!
AND THE SAME PEOPLE WHO DEFEND THE AMERICAN
RIGHT TO ABORT 1.2 HUMAN ANIMALS EACH YEAR PROTEST THE 4000 CASUALTIES OF OUR
BLESSED SOLDIERS AS A REASON TO NOT FIGHT FOR FREEDOM OF PEOPLES.
IT’S WORTH ONE MILLION BABIES A YEAR TO
PROTECT OUR RIGHT OF “CHOICE,” BUT IT IS NOT WORTH IT FOR A SOLDIER TO
HONORABLY COMMIT HIS/HER LIFE TO DEFENDING OUR FREEDOM AND THAT OF OTHERS.
THERE WOULD BE NO “RIGHT TO CHOOSE” WITHOUT
OUR FREEDOM.
Damn.
That’s how civilized we are now, that we rationalize our right to
destroy 1.2 “potential human lives” each year.
And it’s a choice we are free to make.